Now, talking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that is normally used for even ten per cent of its possible.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", when the individual has fastened his wrist to the maximum after a dip and a couple of strokes, return immediately to couch under the umbrella?
If that is their principal use, it's merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of this contemporary era that dates back to the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces the group can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film also winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist due to his renowned fabric strap turned into a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are just two of the first cases that show how - fiction or reality - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day that the brands when it came to describing their models began to use the phrase: "suitable for any occasion".
The 007 change, unfortunately also the legendary "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose function was played by the Omega Seamaster for many years.
But beyond their actual use in this large family whose origins would only have to deal with "hard even more than steel", today there are also versions so bejeweled to fear even when you have to wash the hands.
However, a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let us just mention the features and constructive characteristics of those references.
I've a long standing friend who's an expert diver and that, throughout his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - like that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at large depths.
A True wrist sub Has to Be able to ensure these performances:
Fantastic visibility during the dive
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate verification of the operation of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its motion, either quartz or mechanical
However, the tests didn't end here: today professional diving watches must adhere to specific rules such as those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, that which we know is the best, the best sub could be in the end a watchable to offer features much milder and easier to manage.
I recall this in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece should be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that isn't so when it's done a trivial swim at the sea. It'd be better get more info to avoid diving, especially if ours could not even count on a screw-on crown better still when secure on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
And the security on the waterproof status of this submerged timepieces?
Just for people who would never use them for professional purposes the ideal would here be to have the ability to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in case the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore at a clear condition of non-security.
Sadly, this is the primary reason why even an abyssal super dive watch may need to be hurried into a service center, before seawater entering it risks compromising any mechanism indefinitely. This function currently exists, however on hardly any models, which frankly I don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown tightly. It is the most common case.
Suggestion - When you have worn the costume decide on the fly : leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily make a final but fundamental check on the trimming of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a bit 'of problems related to the time that has to satisfy with the water, and given the essential information, I show you which - at least so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I've divided them into two categories. The sequence in which they appear doesn't signify any ranking.